MY OFFICE

Monday, April 2, 2018


The Concept of Curriculum and Curriculum Development
(Curriculum and Material Development)
Juni Bayu Saputra S.Pd., M.Pd  

A.      The Definition of Curriculum
1.        Curriculum, or course, design is largely a “how-to-do-it” activity that involves the integration of knowledge from many of the areas in the field of Applied Linguistics, such as language acquisition research, teaching methodology, assessment, language description and materials production. (Macalister, 2010)
2.        Curriculum is a social artefact. It is configured according to elements of a cultural heritage that are deened worthy of transmitting or communicating to a new generation of learners. (Hamilton, 1999)
3.        Curriculum is a construct or concept, a verbalization of an extremely complex idea or set of ideas. (Olivia, 2012)
4.        Curriculum indicated a plan to educate students, which means the curriculum is a part of the curriculum and the assessment scope contains curriculum components. (Zais, 1993)
5.        Curriculum is an essentially practical activity to improve the quality of language teaching through the use of systematic planning, development, and review practices in all aspects of a language program. It provides many practical problems in language program which identifies the development and renewal by reflecting on theories and developments of the elements, including needs analysis, planning goals and objectives, testing, materials development, language teaching, and evaluation. (Richards, 2001)
From those definitions above, it can be concluded that curriculum is a set of plan of activity conducted to influence learning process as a guidance which covers several dimensions such as learning objectives, learning materials, teaching method, and assessment to achieve specific educational goals.
B.       Language Curriculum Development
Language curriculum development is an aspect of a broader field of educational activity known as curriculum development or curriculum studies (Richards, 2001). Curriculum development in language teaching began in the 1960s. The changes happened in the teaching methods as a powerful one and the quest for better methods has been a preoccupation of many teachers and applied linguists since the beginning of the twentieth century. Many methods have come and gone in the last 100 years in pursuit of the “best method”, as the following greatest dominance:
1.        Grammar Translation Method (1800-1900)
2.        Direct Method (1890-1930)
3.        Structural Method (1930-1960)
4.        Reading Method (1920-1950)
5.        Audiolingual Method (1950-1970)
6.        Communicative Approach (1970-present)
Curriculum development is a series of activities that contribute to the growth of consensus among the staff, faculty, administration, and students. Curriculum activities will provide a framework that helps teachers to accomplish whatever combination of teaching activities is most suitable in their professional judgement for helping students to learn as efficiently and effectively as possible (Brown, 1995). Curriculum provides a set of components for the improvement and maintenance of an already existing language program. It helps in developing consensus among teachers about the essential elements of curriculum and how those components interact in particular teaching situations.
1.        Needs Analysis
It is as an identification of the language forms that the students will likely need to use in the target language when they are required to actually understand and produce the language.
2.        Goals and Objectives
A logical outcome of determining the needs of a group of language students and what must be accomplished in order to attain and satisfy the students’ need are the specification of Goals, while Objectives are precise statements about what content or skills the students must master in order to attain a particular goal.
3.        Language Testing
Tests can be used to unify a curriculum and give it a sense of cohesion, purpose, and control. It also can be used to drive a program by shaping the expectations of the students and their teachers.
4.        Materials Development
In determining the materials suitable to the students, it is relatively easy to adopt, develop, or adapt materials for a program that is well defined in terms of needs analyses, objectives, and tests.
5.        Language Teaching
Teachers should determine what to teach and how to teach the students. They have also been responsible for selecting or developing course tests and materials. Both teachers and students should be aware of what the objectives for a given course are and how the testing will be conducted. It will also influence the teaching learning process.
6.        Program Evaluation
It is the ongoing process of information gathering, analysis, and synthesis, the entire purpose of which is to constantly improve each element of a curriculum on the basis of what is known about all of the other elements, separately as well as collectively.

C.      Functions and Roles of Curriculum
1.        The Functions of Curriculum
The main function of curriculum in educational program is as a guidance in implementing the learning process. Connected with the students as teaching subject, there are six functions of curriculum, namely:
a.         The adaptive function, it should be able to direct students to be able to adapt to the physical environment and social environment.
b.        Integrative Function, it should be able to produce a personal which is able to live and integrate with the social and community.
c.         Differentiation Function, it provides services to individual differences.
d.        Preparatory function, it should be able to prepare students for further study.
e.         Selective function, it gives an opportunity to the students to choose a program that suits with their ability and interest.
f.         Diagnostic functions, it should direct the students to understand and receive strength (potency) and weakness in the possessed.
(Zais, 1993)

2.        The Roles of Curriculum
As educational program, curriculum has been systematically planned, it  assumed a very important role for education when in the analysis of the nature of society and culture and also schools as social institutions in carrying out its operations, can be determined at least three important roles of curriculum. They are:
a.         The role of conservative
Culture has no earlier than the birth of a certain generation and something will not die and endless generation is concerned
b.        Role of critical or evaluative
Culture is always changing and growing in line with the times that continues to spin. Schools not only inherit the culture but also assess , select the elements of culture that will be inherited. Related to curriculum, the development of curriculum is also based on the changing of culture and society condition.
c.         The role of creative
Curriculum conduct creative activities and constructive in the sense of creating something new and develop according to the needs of the present and future in the community to help each individual develop the potential of him. Curriculum creates lessons, experiences, ways of thinking, ability and new skills, in the sense of providing benefits to the community.
(Zais, 1993)

D.      Principles Underlying the Language Curriculum
Retrieved from http://www.edu.gov.on.ca entitled The Ontario Curriculum: Language (2006), the language curriculum is based on the belief that literacy is critical to responsible and productive citizenship, and that all students can become literate. The curriculum is designed to provide students with the knowledge and skills that they need to achieve this goal. It aims to help students become successful language learners, who share the following characteristics:
1.        understand that language learning is a necessary, life-enhancing, reflective process
2.        communicate – that is, read, listen, view, speak, write, and represent – effectively and with confidence
3.        make meaningful connections between themselves, what they encounter in texts, and the world around them
4.        think critically
5.        understand that all texts advance a particular point of view that must be recognized, questioned, assessed, and evaluated
6.        appreciate the cultural impact and aesthetic power of texts
7.        use language to interact and connect with individuals and communities, for personal growth, and for active participation as world citizens

The study of language and the acquisition of literacy skills are not restricted to the language program, and curriculum promotes the integration of the study of language with the study of other subjects. The language curriculum is also based on the understanding that students learn best when they can identify themselves and their own experience in the material they read and study at school. Students come from a wide variety of backgrounds, each with his or her own set of perspectives, strengths, and needs. Instructional strategies and resources that recognize and reflect the diversity in the classroom and that suit individual strengths and needs are therefore critical to student success.

Bibliography
Brown, James Dean. 1995. The Elements of Language Curriculum. Boston: Heinle & Heinle Publishers.
Hamilton, David. 1999. Learning about Education: An Unfinished Curriculum. Buckingham: Open University Press.
Nation, I.S.P., Macalister, John. 2010. Language Curriculum Design. New York: Taylor & Francis.
Olivia, Peter F., Gordon, Willi8am. 2012. Developing the Curriculum. Pearson Education: 2012.
Richards, Jack C. 2001. Curriculum Development in Language Teaching. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Zais, Robert. 1993. Curriculum: Principle & Foundation. New York: Thomas Y. Crowell Co.
http://www.edu.gov.on.ca. Ministry of Education. 2006. The Ontario Curriculum: Language. ISBN 1-4249-1465-5 (PDF) © Queen’s Printer for Ontario, 2006.


 TEACHING STRATEGIES

Juni Bayu Saputra
Mokhamad Sabil Abdul Aziz
junibayu.albana@gmail.com

A.      The Definition of Teaching Strategy
Teaching strategy is a generalized plan for a lesson which includes structure, instructional objectives and an outline of planned tactics, necessary to implement the strategies (Stone and Morris, in Issac, 2010). Furthermore, Issac (2010) explains that teaching tactics are that behavior of the teacher which he manifests in the class i.e., the developments of the teaching strategies, giving proper stimulus for timely responses, drilling the learnt responses, increasing the responses by extra activities and so on
In this paper, we use term strategy to imply thoughtful planning to do something. When we use the term method, it implies some orderly way of doing something. Thus, we use the terms technique and procedure as synonyms to signify a series of steps that one takes to employ any general model being used in the classroom. Each of these aspects emanate from a broader and more encompassing model (Orlich, Harder, Callahan, Trevisan, & Brown, 2010:4). Furthermore, the following are the difference between teaching method and teaching strategy in more detail:
Teaching Method: (1) it is limited to the presentation of subject matter; (2) methods come under strategy; (3) it is a micro approach; (4) teaching as an art; (5) effective presentation of subject matter; (6) classical Theory of human organization; (7) work is important. Teaching Strategy: (1) when we try to achieve some objectives by any method it becomes strategies; (2) strategy is actually a combination of different method; (3) for E.g. Lecture or textbook or question answer method can be never be used separately; (4) it is a macro approach; (5) it considers teaching as science; (6) its purpose is to create conducive learning environment; (7) it is based on modern theories of organization; (8) (pre determined objectives, becomes strategy); (8) behavior of students and teachers and their mutual relationship.
B.       The Position of Teaching Strategy in Curriculum Development
Taba developed a Grades 1 through 8 social studies curriculum organized around teaching-learning units (Taba, 1971 in Lunenbur, 2011:2). In the process, a curriculum model evolved that is applicable to many types of curricula and that can be used in many different kinds of school settings and school levels: elementary school, middle school, and high school. The model includes an organization of, and relationships among, five mutually interactive elements: objectives, content, learning experiences, teaching strategies, and evaluative measures so that a system of teaching and learning is represented.
C.      Designing Teaching Strategies
Conducting a teaching activity is essentially a network or set of decisions that the trainer takes to correlate the priority elements of his work and to build the best solution with respect to the educational situation again. The one who instructs must find a rational and appropriate formula to combine methods, procedures, techniques, means and forms of organization that lead to an optimal use of the potential of the trained subjects (Neacşu, 1990:219-220). Choosing the procedures for training in relation to the trained subject is the teaching strategy. It is well known that the teaching strategy is the key tool in the instructional design (Ştefan, 2003; Reiser & Dempsey, 2011; & Regeluth, 2013).
The teaching strategy results in a didactic approach to teaching and learning, combining and optimal organizing of the methods, means and forms of grouping of the participants (Cerghit, 2006). These elements, integrated into the operational structures, are based on a systemic vision and designed to ensure an active and creative learning of knowledge and to rationalize the training process. The concept of "strategy" is operated both at the macro level, the intermediate level and the micro level, the latter level being directly linked with learning pedagogy, training theory and practice. Adopting a strategy means adopting a guideline for action, and associating it a certain global way of organizational learning and learning conditions, the use of certain methods and means. It should, naturally, be pointed out that in reality we adopt mixed and combined strategies, according to the objectives, the level of the group we are working with, the contents covered etc.
It is understood that any trainer has great freedom to design their work, drawing graphs, charts, value tables or simply mental schemes which can help increasing their ability to decide and to use effectively combined sets of methods, tools and other training resources (Iurea, Neacsu, Safta & Suditu, 2011; Keegan, 2013. Experience has shown, moreover, that each teaching activity is unique through the configuration of factors and interactions that constitute it, therefore the permanent correcting of some strategies thought beforehand can bring more rigor or rather can provide a positive feedback.
D.      Characteristics of Teaching Strategies
As mentioned before, teaching strategies suggest a way in which a teaching situation can be approached. It is important to underscore their essential characteristics: (1) they have a normative character without the rigidity of a rule; they are the training component of dynamic situations, characterized by flexibility and internal elasticity. The general teaching approach outlined by educational strategies can be "adjusted" and adapted to the training events and conditions. The strategies largely carry the footprint of the trainer’s teaching style, creativity and personality; (2) they have a structuring and modeling function to link the learning situations where learners are placed and to trigger their psychological mechanisms of learning; (3) the components of the strategy (methods, means and organization forms of the work) form a system, establishing the connection between them, even interrelations and interdependencies. A teaching strategy can be decomposed into a series of operations, steps, rules of conduct specific to different teaching sequences so that each decision indicating the transition to the next sequence by exploiting the information obtained in the previous step; (4) they do not identify either with the opted methodological system or the basic teaching method because the teaching strategy aims at the training process as a whole, not a single training sequence; (5) they have probabilistic meaning, that is that a particular teaching strategy, although scientifically founded and appropriate for the psychological resources of participants, cannot guarantee the success of the training process because there is a large number of variables that can intervene in the process; (6) they involve the students in specific learning situations and rationalize and adequate the training content to their personality; and (7) they create an ideal framework for interactions between other components of the training process (Ionescu & Radu, 2001:184-185).
E.       Types of Teaching Strategies
There are many kinds of teaching strategies that can be applied in the language teaching process. Wehrli (2003) explained the teaching strategies as follow.

1.        Brainstorming
Brainstorming is a process for generating multiple ideas/options in which judgment is suspended until a maximum number of ideas has been generated. Al-maghrawy in Al-khatib (2012: 31) also defines that brainstorming as a group creativity forum for general ideas.
Moreover, Sayed in Al-khatib (2012: 31) purposed some importance of brainstorming for the students. Those are: (a) helping students to solve problems; (b) helping students to benefit from the ideas of others through the development and build on them; and (c) helping the cohesion of the students and building relationships among them and assess the views of others.
In addition, brainstorming has some advantageous, they are: (a) actively involving learners in higher levels of thinking; (b) promoting peer learning and creates synergy; (c) promoting critical thinking; and (d) helping groups reach consensus.
On the other hand, there are some disadvantageous of brainstorming. (a) requiring learners discipline; (b) may not be effective with large groups; and (c) can lead to “group think”.

2.        Case-based Small-group Discussion
In this teaching strategy, small groups of 5-10 address case-based tasks, exchanging points of view while working through a problem-solving process. In this teaching strategy process, Srinivasan, Wilkes, Stevenson, Nguyen, and Slavin (2007) explained that the group focuses on creative problem solving, with some advance preparation. Discovery is encouraged in a format in which both students and facilitators share responsibility for coming to closure on cardinal learning points.
Case-based Small-group Discussion has some advantageous. They can be (a) actively involves participants and stimulates peer group learning; (b) helps participants explore pre-existing knowledge and build on what they know; (c) facilitates exchange of ideas and awareness of mutual concerns; and (d) promotes development of critical thinking skills;
On the other hand, Case-based Small-group Discussion has some disadvantageous. It (a) can potentially degenerate into off-task or social conversations; (b) can be a challenge to ensure participation by all, especially in larger groups; and (c) can be frustrating for participants when they are at significantly different levels of knowledge and skill.

3.        Demonstration
Demonstration means performing an activity so that learners can observe how it is done in order to help prepare learner to transfer theory to practical application. Moreover, demonstration strategy involves the teacher showing learners how to do something (Adekoya and Olatoye, 2011).
The advantageous of demonstration are to (a) help people who learn well by modelling others; (b) promote self-confidence; (c) provide opportunity for targeted questions and answers; and (d) allow attention to be focused on specific details rather than general theories.
The disadvantageous of demonstration: (a) is of limited value for people who do not learn best by observing others; (b) may not be appropriate for the different learning rates of the participants; and (c) requires that demonstrator have specialized expertise if highly technical tasks are involved.

4.        Games
Games are used to bring competition, participation, drills, and feedback into the learning experience as a motivator and opportunity for application of principles. Carefully planned uses of games in the classroom (e.g., for practicing certain verbs, tenses, questions, locatives, etc.) add some interest to a classroom (Brown, 2000: 146).
The advantageous of game: (a) actively involves learners; (b) can add or regenerate motivation; (c) promotes team learning and collaborative skills; (d) provides a challenge that can lead to confidence in knowing and expressing the material; (e) provides feedback; and (f) can create a “fun” learning environment.
The disadvantageous of game: (a) can create in-group/out-group feelings; (b) can demotivate students who are not competitive by nature; (c) can create feelings of inadequacy in those not as skilled or forceful; and (d) can discourage creativity if the format is very rigid and the focus is strongly on winning.

5.        Independent Study
Independent study is a teaching strategy designed to enhance and support other instructional activities. Learning activity is typically done entirely by the individual learner (or group of learners) using resource materials. It may be done using computer/web-based technology. Alberta Learning (2002: 73) also defines independent study as an individualized learning experience that allows students to select a topic focus, define problems or questions, gather and analyze information, apply skills, and create a product to show what has been learned.
The advantageous of independent study: (a) fosters independent learning skills; (b) allows learners to progress at their own rate; and (c) enhances other learning experiences.
The disadvantageous of independent study: (a) may be disconnected from immediate objectives; and (b) may be difficult to identify/access appropriate materials.

F.       The principles of Effective Teaching Strategy
Devlin and Samarawickrema (2010: 113-114) proposed ten principles of effective teaching strategy. They are: (1) Teaching and curriculum design need to be focused on meeting students’ future needs, implying the development in students of generic capabilities such as critical thinking, teamwork and communication skills, amongst others; (2) Students must have a thorough understanding of fundamental concepts even if that means less content is covered; (3) The relevance of what is taught must be established by using real-life, current and/or local examples and by relating theory to practice; (4) Student beliefs must be challenged to deal with misconceptions; (5) A variety of learning tasks that engage students, including student discussion, need to occur in order that meaningful learning takes place; (6) Genuine, empathetic relationships with individual students should be established so that interaction can take place; (7) Teachers should motivate students through displaying their own enthusiasm, encouraging students and providing interesting, enjoyable and active classes; (8) Curriculum design should ensure that aims, concepts, learning activities and assessment are consistent with achieving learning outcomes related to future student needs; (9) Each lesson must be thoroughly planned but flexible so that necessary adaptations may be made based on feedback during the class; and (10) Assessment must be consistent with the desired learning outcomes and should, therefore, be authentic tasks for the discipline or profession.

References
Adekoya, Y. M. & Olatoye R. A. (2011). Effect of Demonstration, Peer-Tutoring, and Lecture Teaching Strategies on Senior Secondary School Students’ Achievement in an Aspect of Agricultural Science. The Pacific Journal of Science and Technology, 12, 320 -332.
Al-khatib, B. A. (2012). The Effect of Using Brainstorming Strategy in Developing Creative Problem Solving Skills among Female Students in Princess Alia University College. American International Journal of Contemporary Research, 2, 29-38.
Brown, H. D. (2000). Teaching by Principles: An Interactive Approach to Language Pedagogy. New York: Longman.
Cerghit, I. (2006). Metode de învăţământ. Iaşi: Editura Polirom.
Devlin, Marcia and Samarawickrema, Gayani. (2010). The criteria of effective teaching in a changing higher education context. Higher Education Research & Development, 29: 2, 111 — 124. DOI: 10.1080/07294360903244398.
Iurea, C., Neacsu, I., Safta, C. G., & Suditu, M. (2011). The Study of the Relation between the Teaching Methods and the Learning Styles. The Impact upon Students’ Academic Conduct. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 11, 256-260.
Ionescu, M., & Radu, I. (2001). Didactica modernă. Cluj-Napoca: Editura Dacia.
Issac, Jerin C. (2010). Methods and Strategies of Teaching: an  overview. Pondicherry University Press
Keegan, D. (2013). Theoretical Principles of Distance Education. London: Routledge.
Lunenburg Fred C. (2011). Curriculum Development: Inductive Models. Sam Houston State University. Schooling Volume 2, Number 1, 2011   
Neacşu, I. (1990). Instruire şi învăţare. Bucureşti: Editura Ştiinţifică.
Orlich D.C., Harder R.J., Callahan R.C., Trevisan M.S., Brown A.H., (2010). Teaching Strategies: A Guide to Effective Instruction, Ninth Edition. Wadsworth, Cengage Learning
Regeluth, C. M. (2013). Instructional-design Theories and Models: A New Paradigm of Instructional Theory. London: Routledge.
Reiser, R. A., & Dempsey, J. V. (2011). Trends and issues in instructional design and technology. Pearson.
Srinivasan, Wilkes, Stevenson, Nguyen, and Slavin. (2007). Comparing Problem-Based Learning with Case-Based Learning: Effects of a Major Curricular Shift at Two Institutions. Academic Medicine, 82, 74-82.
Ştefan, M. (2003). Teoria situaţiilor educative. Bucureşti : Editura Aramis.
Wehrli, G., Nyquist, J.G. (2003). Creating an Educational Curriculum for Learners at Any Level. AABB Conference.


Saturday, May 21, 2016

Selama ini, proses seleksi SNMPTN telah menjadi suatu misteri sehingga banyak orang  yang beranggapan bahwa lulus tidaknya seseorang dalam SNMPTN ditentukan oleh faktor nasib. Peserta  hanya membayar, mendaftar, mengikuti ujian dan akhirnya menerima hasil.  Sebagian besar peserta tidak mengetahui proses apa yang akan dilakukan panitia SNMPTN terhadap Formulir Pendaftaran dan Lembar Jawaban yang telah mereka isi hingga pengumuman hasil SNMPTN.  Hal ini diperparah oleh keterbatasan informasi mengenai SNMPTN sehingga banyak peserta yang tidak lolos sering menjadikan proses ini sebagai kambing hitam apalagi ketika melihat temannya yang menurut dia kemampuannya lebih rendah malah diterima/lolos.
Bisa jadi banyak peserta bertanya-tanya kenapa nggak diterima di Perguruan Tinggi Negeri (PTN) melalui Seleksi Nasional Masuk Perguruan Tinggi Negeri (SNMPTN) , padahal  termasuk siswa yang selalu masuk ranking dikelasnya. Tapi Entis Surentis  teman sekelasnya yang biasa-biasa saja malah diterima di PTN yang dipilihnya melalui SNMPTN.   Mungkin postingan ini bisa membantu menjawab misteri SNMPTN.  Tulisan ini diambil dari beberapa sumber  dengan maksud sebagai bahan evaluasi diri, paling tidak bagi adik-adik yang akan mengikuti  SNMPTN akan lebih bisa mempersiapkan diri untuk bertarung memperoleh kursi di PTN yang diminatinya.
Tentu saja paling utama untuk bisa lolos SNMPTN adalah kesiapan diri baik mental maupun akademik, termasuk memahami sistem penilaiannya.  Saya pikir itu berlaku untuk semua ujian, evaluasi, monitoring.  Artinya bagi yang di uji, yang dimonitoring, maupun yang dievaluasi mesti tahu betul sistem, kriteria, dan materi  penialaiannya. Apabila kita tidak tahu dan paham maka hampir dapat dipastikan kita nggak akan lolos karena kita tidak tahu apa yang mesti dipersiapkan.
SISTEM PENILAIAN SNMPTN  
Sistem Penilaian SNMPTN tahun-tahun sebelum 2009 menggunakan SISTEM NILAI MENTAH yaitu mengakumulasikan jumlah nilai dari mata pelajaran yang diujikan secara total.  Sedangkan sistem penilaian SNMPTN mulai  tahun 2010 memberlakukan SISTEM PERSENTIL  yaitu penlaian per mata pelajaran yang diujikan secara terpisah.  Dengan system persentil peserta SNMPTN harus mengerjakan semua mata pelajaran yang diujikan karena semua hasil tes akan diperiksa dan dinilai secara terpisah.  Penggunaan system penilaian tersebut mempunyai dampak yang berbeda dalam menentukan siapa yang akan lolos SNMPTN.
Sebelum tahun 2009, pada saat menggunakan system NILAI MENTAH banyak  peserta yang lolos atau diterima oleh satu program studi/jurusan di PTN dengan hanya mengandalkan satu mata pelajaran yang dianggap paling dikuasainya. Sedangkan mata pelajaran lain  tidak dijawab satupun dalam lembar jawaban (kosong).  Oleh sebab itu banyak peserta/siswa dari Jurusan IPA lolos (diterima)  di Akuntansi UI atau Fikom Unpad, karena mereka mengandalkan kemampuan di matematika, sementara pelajaran Ekonominya jelek bahkan mungkin tidak diisi/dikosongkan untuk menghindari nilai minus.  Namun demikian bukan berarti yang lolos SNMPTN adalah peserta yang mengisi seluruh mata pelajaran dengan 100% benar jawabannya.  menurut saya sangatlah sulit (mendekati tidak mungkin !) peserta SNMPTN mampu mengisi seluruh soal dengan benar 100%,  (kecuali jenius  he..he).  Jika kita termasuk orang biasa-biasa  dan tidak jenius, maka strategi mutlak diperlukan selain mempersiapkan kemampuan akademik (yang terbatas itu…he..he)
Sejak tahun 2009 SNMPTN telah menggunakan penilaian dengan sistem persentil. Sistem penilaian presentil menghendaki peserta mengerjakan semua mata pelajaran yang diujikan. Tindakan pengosongan jawaban satu atau dua mata pelajaran saja maka akan dinyatakan sebagai NILAI MATI dan dapat dipastikan peserta tidak akan lolos seleksi . Dapat difahami tujuan dari pemberlakukan sistem persentil adalah untuk menjaring para peserta SNMPTN yang memiliki kemampuan lebih komprehensif artinya tidak hanya mengandalkan satu atau dua mata pelajaran yang di ujikan.   Dari penilaian secara terpisah tersebut nantinya akan diberikan rangking dan peserta yang rangking rata-ratanya bagus di semua mata pelajaran yang diujikan berpeluang besar untuk lolos. Pokoknya, jangan sekali-kali mengosongkan jawaban satu matapelajaranpun, jawablah minimal satu pertanyaan tapi benar.
 TES BIDANG STUDI PREDIKTIF (TBSP) 
Perlu dipahami pula bahwa setiap bidang studi (mata pelajaran)  Tes Bidang Studi Prediktif (TBSP)  di nilai berdasarkan aturan, sebagai berikut :
  • Apabila jawaban betul dikalikan 4 (empat)
  • Apabila jawaban salah dikali -1. (minus satu),
  • Apabila tidak dijawab dikalikan 0 (nol).
Dengan aturan tersebut maka jangan menjawab asal-asalan atau menjawab tapi tidak yakin bahwa jawabannya benar.  Carilah pertanyaan lain yang  dapat dijawab dengan benar (lebih baik satu jawaban benar dari pada banyak menjawab tapi salah). Berikut  ilustrasi jawaban dari dua orang peserta :
Soal No.Peserta APeserta B
JawabanSkorJawabanSkor
1Benar4Benar4
2Benar4Kosong0
3Salah-1Kosong0
4Salah-1Kosong0
5Salah-1Kosong0
6Salah-1Kosong0
7Salah-1Kosong0
Jumlah34
Dari ilustrasi di atas   bahwa kita jangan terlalu bernafsu menjawab tapi tidak yakin jika jawaban kita benar.  Walaupun peserta A mampu menjawab lebih banyak namun banyak yang jawabannya salah.  (benar 2 dan  salah 5) sehingga skor totalnya hanya 3. Oleh sebab itu jangan berspekulasi. Peserta B, walaupun hanya menjawab 1 benar, namun tidak bersepekulasi menjawab soal lainnya. sehingga skor totalnya 4 (lebih tinggi dari peserta A). Oleh sebab itu  jawablah pertanyaan jika dianggap  mampu menjawab dengan benar,  lebih baik lewat dulu pertanyaan sulit.  Jangan terbawa penasaran sehingga menghabiskan waktu untuk mengutak-ngatik soal dan jawaban.
Kontribusi atau bobot TBSP terhadap total skore adalah 70% (0,7),  Apabila jumlah  yang diujikan 7  matapelajaran maka masing-masing matapelajaran mempunyai bobot 70%  : 7 = 10 %  (0,1). Sedangkan sisanya yang 30 % untuk bobot Tes Potensi Akademik (TPA)
Setelah skor didapat, maka dilakukan pembobotan  hasil  TBSP masing-masing matapelajaran dikali 0,1 (total 70%, karena ada 7 bidang studi).  Inilah yang disebut sebagai nilai mentah (raw score). Dari skor ini peserta mendapatkan rangking per bidang studi  di program studi yang dipilihnya.
Berikut ilustrasi sederhana perbedaan sistem penilaian persentil dengan sistem nilai mentah :
Contoh Perhitungan dengan Sistem NILAI MENTAH
Misal ada 3 siswa Cecep, Entis, dan Aep dengan nilai sbb:
NamaPelajaran 1RankPelajaran 2RankPelajaran 3RankTotal
Cecep1001103103120
Entis30230230290
Aep103501501110
Menurut cara lama (NILAI MENTAH) urutan kelulusan didasarkan skor total, dalam hal ini
1. Cecep  (120)
2. Aep  (110)
3 .Entis  (90)
Menurut Sistem NILAI MENTAH, Jika jumlah kapasitas yang dapat diterima 2 orang,  maka yang akan lulus adalah Cecep  dan Aep. (Perhatikan ! Rangking Nilai/skor setiap mata pelajaran tidak diperhitungkan)
Menurut SISTEM PERSENTIL, setiap pelajaran siswa akan diranking. dan diberi NILAI BOBOT  dengan rumus sebagai berikut :  100 kali (1–(rangking/jumlah perserta)
Namarankpel 1nilai pel 1rankpel 2nilai pel 2rank pel 3nilai pel 3TotalSkor
Cecep1100 x (1- 1/3)= 673100 x (1- 3/3)= 03100 x (1- 3/3)= 067
Aep2100 x (1- 2/3)= 332100 x (1- 2/3)= 332100 x (1- 2/3)= 3399
Entis3100 x (1- 3/3)= 01100 x (1- 1/3)= 671100 x (1- 1/3)= 67134
Dengan sistem persentil ternyata urutan terbaik adalah
1.  Entis   (134)
2.  Aep     (99)
3. Cecep  (67)
Menurut SISTEM PERSENTIL, jika jumlah kapasitas yang dapat diterima 2 orang, maka yang akan lulus adalah Entis dan Aep.
Berdasarkan penilaian secara terpisah itu, hasil tes akan diberikan rangking. Coba perhatikan ! Entis misalnya, pada sistem NILAI MENTAH dia memperoleh total skor yang paling rendah. Jika sistem nilai mentah Entis  “TIDAK LOLOS”. Namun dengan sistem PRESENTIL justru Entis “LOLOS” Kenapa ? Karena Entis mempunyai ranking yang relatif stabil disetiap matapelajaran yaitu rangking 2 di semua matapelajaran. Berbeda dengan Cecep, walaupun pada sistem nilai mentah dia LOLOS (karena mempunyai skor mentah tertinggi), Namun dengan sistem presentil Cecep malah “TIDAK LOLOS” Kenapa ? Karena Cecep hanya mengandalkan Mata pelajaran A  (rangking 1) sedangkan mata pelajaran lainnya diabaikan (mempunyai rangking 3).
Artinya, peserta dengan rangking rata-ratanya tinggi  di semua mata pelajaran yang diujikan akan berpeluang besar lolos SNMPTN. Oleh sebab itu Jika tidak bisa tinggi semua…yaaaa paling tidak stabil di semua mata pelajaran.
Ilustrasi diatas mudah-mudahan mampu menjelaskan misteri, kenapa teman kalian yang tidak diperhitung ketika di SMA  malah LOLOS di SNMPTN.
Informasi sistem penilaian presentil inilah yang tidak semua calon peserta mengetahuinya. Sehingga menganggap bahwa temannya yang tidak mempunyai kemampuan “mumpuni” malah lolos di SNMPTN. Saya tidak menyatakan bahwa teman anda yang dianggap “tidak mumpuni” itu mendadak pinter ketika ikut SNMPTN  atau “main mata dengan panitia. Tapi saya yakin dia mempunyai strategi jitu untuk bisa lolos SNMPTN karena sadar nggak mungkin mendadak pinter, tapi pasti dia  Cerdas !
Tentu saja tujuan Panitia memberlakukan sistem persentil itu adalah untuk menjaring/menyaring para peserta SNMPTN yang memiliki kemampuan lebih komprehensif. Alasannya, banyak kasus yang telah terjadi sebelumnya, di mana peserta yang lolos dan diterima di sebuah jurusan/program studi di PTN ternyata tidak memiliki kemampuan yang mahir sesuai jurusan yang dipilihnya.
Bagaimana kita memperoleh data pendaftar pada program studi yang kita pilih pada tahun ini ?  tentu saja tidak bisa, kita hanya bisa memperoleh jumlah pendaftar  tahun sebelumnya dengan cara googling.  jika sudah diperoleh maka kita bisa memprediksi seberapa besar peluang untuk bisa lolos.
 TES POTENSI AKADEMIK 
Selain TBSP,   SNMPTN  juga menambahkan satu materi tes yaitu Test Potensi Akademik (TPA) dengan bobot penilaian 30 persen.  Bentuk TPA sendiri adalah tes kemampuan berpikir secara logis. Tes tersebut  berbeda dari psikotes yang harus ditangani khusus oleh psikolog.
Pada dasarnya TPA bertujuan untuk menjaring peserta SNMPTN dengan menekankan panilaian pada tiga poin, yaitu kemampuan komunikasi, analisis, dan hitungan. TPA merupakan indikator panilaian intelegensia alamiah peserta, selain untuk menjaring siswa yang betul-betul memiliki kemampuan yang konprehensif melalui TPBSP.
Tes ini juga berguna sebagai indikator penilaian yang bebas dari kontaminasi bimbingan belajar sebab kebanyakan siswa yang lulus dan bisa mengerjakan soal tes hanya karena hapal rumus yang didapat saat bimbingan belajar saja bukan murrni kemampuan berpikir sendiri. Test ini juga bertujuan untuk menghindari peserta lolos tetapi tidak cocok dengan jurusan/program studi yang dipilihnya.
Soal-soal TPA memang tidak secara khusus diajarkan di Sekolah. Kemampuan menjawab TPA akan sangat bergantung pada pengetahuan umum dan kebiasaan membaca diluar buku pelajaran, seperti majalah, koran,  berita TV dan lain-lain.  Carilah contoh-contoh soal TPA agar anda terbiasa menjawab secara benar dan cepat.  Perlu dipahami pula bahwa SNMPTN dirancang untuk menjaring calon mahasiswa yang selain pintar tapi juga cerdas. Jika kita merasa nggak terlalu pintar…paling tidak harus cerdas laah ! (bukan cerdik yah..).
MATERI SOAL
Materi soal untuk Seleksi Nasional Masuk Perguruan Tinggi Negeri (SNMPTN) dimungkinkan dibuat berbeda dari tahun ke tahun. Materi soal yang bersifat prediktif tersebut nantinya akan menjadi acuan untuk bisa mengetahui potensi calon mahasiswa sesuai program studi pilihannya. Bisa saja  materi soal SNMPTN tidak mengulang materi yang sudah diujikan pada Ujian Nasional (UN) SMA/Sederajat. Soal-soal dibuat di luar kurikulum SMA/Sederajat untuk bisa melihat kemampuan dan kelulusan siswa yang akan menimba ilmu di bangku kuliah sesuai program studi yang dipilih.
Idealnya, semua matapelajaran TBSP dan TPA harus bagus,  namun apabila dilihat dari soal-soal yang dikeluarkan , saya malah melihat tidak ada satu orang pesertapun yang akan mampu menjawab secara benar seluruh soal yang diujikan dengan waktu sangat terbatas.   Tanpa bermaksud mengajak berspekulasi, bagaimanapun perlu dilakukan strategi dan taktik agar bisa lolos dengan berbagai keterbatasan kemampuan yang ada pada diri kita.
Dari uraian diatas beberapa catatan taktik dan strategi yang perlu dilakukan :
1.  Pahami betul kriteria penilaian dan aturan main SNMPTN
2. Pelajarilah soal-soal SNMPTN tahun-tahun sebelumnya agar terbiasa dengan bentuk dan materi soal/pertanyaan SNMPTN
3. Ikutilah beberapa kali Try Out  jauh sebelum SNMPTN  yang diselenggarakan oleh penyelenggara Bimbel agar dapat mengukur kemampuan dan meningkatkannya.
4. Jawablah pertanyaan matapelajaran yang diujikan, jangan ada satu matapelajaranpun yang dikosongkan, jika ini dilakukan maka akan masuk pada NILAI MATI, yang dapat dipastikan tidak lolos
5. Jawablah soal yang  yakin dapat dijawab dengan benar, walaupun hanya 1 atau 2 soal sekalipun.  Jangan bernafsu untuk menjawab seluruh pertanyaan tapi tidak yakin bisa menjawab dengan benar.  Berdasarkan pengalaman peserta  dari yang Lolos SNMPTN tahun-tahun sebelumnya, justru di hanya menjawab 1, 2 atau 3 pertanyaan dari setiap mapel, tapi yakin benar.
6. Jawablah soal yang paling mudah terlebih dahulu.  Jangan habiskan waktu mengutak-ngatik soal sulit  hanya karena penasaran.  Jawablah soal seperti anda mengisi teka teki silang. Setelah mengisi yang mudah biasanya akan muncul inspirasi jawaban soal yang sulit yang tadinya dilewat.
7. Pahami mata pelajaran pendukung program studi yang dipilih.  Misalnya  anda memilih program studi Teknik Sipil maka matapelajaran pendukungnya adalah matematik dan fisika. Upayakan nilai tes Matematik dan Fisika tinggi.
8. Carilah informasi jumlah pendaftar dan daya tampung pada program Studi yang dipilih di tahun-tahun sebelumnya  sebagai gambaran jumlah pesaing dan memprediksi ranking. (biasanya jumlah pendaftar tahun sebelumnya nggak terlalu jauh berbeda).  Misalnya disini
9. Walaupun tidak ada passing grade, namun perlu diperoleh informasi skore total (TBSP +TPA) yang dapat diterima di Program Studi yang dipilih dan bandingkan dengan hasil try out jika masih dibawah tingkatkan kemampuan samapai melebihi skore minimal Program Studi yang dipilih.
10. Jika ternyata  Skore  beberapa Try out tidak mampu melampaui nilai minimal, sudah saatnya mempertimbangkan untuk mengalihkan pilihan program studi atau PTN  yang  “passing grade”nya lebih rendah.
11. Ikutilah SNMPTN dengan tenang dan tidak menjadi beban berat yang seolah-olah jika tidak diterima SNMPTN masa depan atau reputasi anda hancur…!


Semoga berhasil !